-------
 ,,

### Nouns with plural variants allowed
 ,,
 ,,

### Nouns with only smichut allowed (not the nifrad)
 ,,,
 ,,,

### Words that include he hashe'la. In theory, almost anything can be
### preceded by he hashe'la, but in modern usage, only these specific
### cases appear:
# Note that unlike ,  has kubuts and an added waw!





# Perhaps add more inflections of ...



# The Academia writes in http://hebrew-academy.huji.ac.il/decision3.html
# (November 4 2002 decision)
#     '', ''     - ,    -
# .           .  
#    ( " ?" " ?")    , 
#      ".


# [3] says  is plural, but [4] says it is singular (though its textual
# description says  is kind of , which is plural...)
 ,,

# [3] and [4] agree that yod should be added in  for the tsere. I don't
# understand why:

-
-


 ,











 





















 ,,
 ,,
 ,,






 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,







# [3] prefers , with tsere, and points  to it. [4] allows ionly
# , with tsere maleh (i.e., yod already in the spelling with niqqud).
# [2] prefers the tsere male, pointing the tsere version to it. Google shows
# the version with yod to be vastly more common (7000 vs 200).
# For now we'll allow both. TODO: reconsider.


 ,,
















-
-




# )(



















# -    " 












# TODO: move these to wolig.dat or biza-nouns
 ,,
 ,,,
 ,,,





















-
# Is - a valid plural of -? [4] appears to think it is because it
# recognizes this form, but it doesn't write anything about it. [2] and [3]
# don't list this form. TODO: find an Academia decision on this word...
-
-


# I don't know why the following has kubuts, but [3] says that...


















####     :
#  
 ,,
#    ) (
 ,,
#   
 ,,
#  ,  

#  

#  

#  


#  * ,

#  

#   -  ,  

#  

# -,  ,  ,  ,  ,  
 ,,
#  


# -
 ,,,
#  

#  
 ,,
#  

# - ) :    !(
 ,,,
# -
 ,,
#  
 ,,
#  
 ,,
# added yod in . used as " ..."

#  


#  


#  
 ,,
#  
 ,,
#   ("     ]3[, ]4[ -    )

#  
 ,,
#  

#  
 ,,
#  
 ,,
 ,,
# -. note added yod for ktiv male
 ,,
#   
 ,,
#  
 
#  
 ,,
#  . note added yod for ktiv male
 ,,
#  
 ,,

# Slang words:
 ,,
 ,,
# note that  is slang... [3] spells it as '...


#   "". woo     ,   
#       







# The following are strange inflections of the Aramaic word "".
# The dictionaries I consulted are in complete disagreement about the correct
# inflections:
# * [2] and [3] list the following bizarre Aramaic inflections:
#              
#   The problem is that these inflections are never used nowadays, and the more
#   typically used inflections, like  is not considered at all correct.
#    Of these inflections, arguably only  and  is in use today.
# * [4] compeletely disagrees with the other dictionaries: it has the
#   inflections of the word "" and "", saying that it is from Aramaic
#   but using the normal Hebrew inflections:
#      , , , , , , , , , .
# I decided to go with [4] in this case.












######   ) ,    ,   (.
# )" - (










# )" - (

















# [4] acknowledges that  is the Academia standard spelling, but prefers
# the spelling . See longer comment in wolig.dat.

# )" -   (































# )" - (









# )" - (


# )" - (
# )" - (




# )" - (

 ,,
 ,,





# )" - (



# )" - (



# ) (
















# ) (





# [3] and [4] say the correct vowel-less spelling of  is with just one
# yod. I don't understand why. TODO: reconsider this.




######  :
# ) (










# ) , (






#  recognized by [4], and useful in combination like 


# ) , (












# ) (















# ) (

# ) (

# note that [3] doesn't recognize , only ...





###### words from wolig.dat with additional he hamegama...









# See Academia's rules on why  is spelled with one yud. For ,
# that is my guess (based on the explicit rule to spell ).


######  

#
###### , ,  

 ,,
######    )   (:
###### ) ,  -  -(
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
# ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
#  not recognized by [2], but it is a common name.
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
#    ,   )   ...(. ,  -
#     "  "   .
#         --   -wolig.dat,
#     . : , , , , .
#             -,
#     .          
#  -   , ,  ) !(
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
#
######   - :
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
######  ,   
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
######   
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,
 ,
######         ,  
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
######   ",  
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
#   ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
#   ,
###### :
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
 ,,,
# Interestingly, the month name  often appears with the definite article.
 ,,
######  ) (:
#            -wolig.dat
#what's the correct spelling?
 ,
# an archaic alternative to , that is too easily confused with
# ...
# ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
# TODO: I'm not sure about the double yod here...
 ,
# Note: this is rav-millim's spelling, without an Aleph. See also 
# in wolig.dat.
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
' ,
 ,
' ,
# [4] prefers  but also allows . I'm allowing the latter
# because it's 10 times more popular on a Google search, and also follows
# the common pronunciation more accurately.
 ,
 ,
#    ...
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
######   :
#    ,  ,      "
# ,     "":
 
 
 
 
 
#  is the correct ktiv hasar niqqud. TODO: Should I allow  also??
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ,
 ,
 
 
 
 
 
 ,
 ,
 ,
#       :
 ,
###### :
#       ) ...(  -wolig.dat  .



 
 
###### :
#The first few commented out cities have a "person from ..." adjective, and
#appear in wolig.dat.
# ,
# ,
# ,
# ,
# ,
 ,
" ,
" ,
" ,
#" , - not recognized by [4] and much less common in Google than "
" ,
" ,
" ,
" ,
" ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
# The vowelled spelling is , so why not write it this way? I don't know.
# [4] spells it with an added waw, and so does everyone, apparently.
# TODO: rethink this decision.
 ,
' ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
' ,
# ,
 ,
 ,
 ,

# ,
 ,
# ,
 ,
# ,
# ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
# [4] says the ktiv chaser is , maleh is . I have no idea why.
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
# ,
' ,
# ,
# [4] prefers  over  (but allows both). But most people pronounce
# and write 
 ,
# ,
 ,
# Sometimes written as ', ', '.
' ,
 ,
 ,

 ,

######  : )   ,    (
#  
 ,
 ,
 ,
# 
 ,
# ,
 ,
# ,
 ,
# ,
 ,
 ,
 ,

######  , , ':
 ,,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,

######  ':






"
 ,,



# this is enamel, not e-mail !
 ,,
#     ?

 ,,
 ,,
 ,,

 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
 ,,
###   :

 ,,
 ,,




 ,,







 ,,
# should I add these herbs?
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
######  :
# TODO: is it correct that the plural of " - " (and similar for all other
# acronyms)? [4] accepts this form, and I tend to as well, despite the fact
# that the plural of " " is obviously not " ".
"
" ,,
" ,,
" ,,
" ,,
" ,,
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
# There isn't a complete concensus as to whether one should write " or
# ", and similarly for ". [4] prefers the final-letter versions - "
# and ". But [4] also accepts the non-final-letter versions as alternative
# spellings. [3] prefers a strange combination: " but ". The older [2]
# accepts only the non-final-letter versions: " and ".
# I decided to allow the final-letter versions only. This makes more sense
# when the acronym is read out as a real word (and the plural form is a good
# proof of that. compare " which is not commonly read out as a word).
# Also, I was told that this is the way these ranks are always spelled in
# the army.
#
# Another questions is whether these ranks have feminine variants, or whether
# the same words apply to females too. [4] commits the ultimate male-chauvinist
# faux-pas: it recognizes ", but not " or ", and mark all the
# nouns ", ", " as masculine. Again, I was told that in the army
# the special feminine forms ", ", etc., is commonly used. Some ranks,
# however, are used for both genders: e.g., .
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
# TODO: consider feminine and plural forms of ", ", just like ".
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
" ,,
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
#" is   , but is too easily confused with "...
#"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
" ,,,
" ,,,
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
" ,,
" ,,
"
"
"
"
"
" ,,,
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
" 
" ,,
" ,,,
" ,,
"
"
"
"
"
##### :
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
#####  :
#   -.          - 
# " , ,   - ,       ? 
#   ?  ?    ?    ?    ?
#        -,      ?
#    ?
#     niqqudless.sxw
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
#####     .
#   -     )   niqqudless.sxw(.
#             - A/E/I, V/Y,
# G/J )    -(,       
#    .
#     -      I  ,  ,
#  Y  .  "--" (CIA)  12     
#      ,  ,  I.     
#  Y.
#   "",     x,   -  .
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
' ,
' ,
 ,
' ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
#####  
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
##### :
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
#####   "",  .
#       . ]4[  ,     
#      ) ", ", " (.
"
"
# [4] prefers ", but popular speach and writing has it ".
"
###### :
#   (, , , ...)     wolig.dat.
-------



-------










-
-------








-
-------








-------








-------








-------








-------







-------








-------



-------

-------

-------

-------

-------

-------

-------

-------

-------
#  and its inflections are in wolig.dat

-------
#  and its inflections are in wolig.dat

-------


-
-------


-
-------


-
-------


-
-------


-
-------


-
